Many of the novels that we call plantation romances also
bear a different name: we know them and see them discussed as "
Anti-Tom
novels," written implicitly or explicitly to counter the negative
view of the South that
Harriet
Beecher Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin (1852) popularized with
such amazing force. Even before her novel appeared serially, southern
novels set on plantations were responding to abolitionist rhetoric
with idealistic portrayals of the master class, embellished with usually
silent slaves in the background. The slave narrative, conversely, is viewed
as having its impetus as an explicitly abolitionist form, like Stowe's
novel (indeed the narratives were an important source for her book's rendering
of slave life). The fugitive or freed slaves, writing first-hand accounts
of bondage, would hardly be expected to claim to be southerners and might
understandably have identified themselves, once free, as radically "Different-From"
the region where they had been denied human identity. Yet the narratives
actually remind us how deeply slaves "belonged" to the South – not only
in the horrifying legal sense but also in terms of their own self-identification,
as well as loyalty to their own blood families (not their romantically
and falsely defined "white" families).
Read together, the "loyalist" plantation romance and the "fugitive"
slave narrative speak to one another as symbiotic southern genres,
even if only contrapuntally. The plantation romances were written
partly as answers to
Northern media’s images,
yet it is also striking to note some thematic coding within the genre
that deconstructs some of the transparent pro-slavery positions they
presume to vocate. This genre was perhaps not intentionally one of
resistance, yet writers and readers of such works seem to have been
unable to avoid using the form not only to promote their way of life
but also to express their deep anxieties about it.
Published: 4 March 2004
© 2004 Lucinda MacKethan and
Southern
Spaces