From
Upper Hogthief, Georgia, to “Fait,” Alabama: Regionalism in
Longstreet’s Georgia Scenes and Hooper’s Some
Adventures of Captain Simon Suggs
from the The Seventeenth Southern Writers Symposium
Adam Tate, Stillman College
Abstract:
Two of the best works of Southwest humor, Augustus
Baldwin Longstreet's Georgia Scenes and Johnson Jones
Hooper's Some Adventurers of Captain Simon Suggs, provide a revealing
glimpse into the dynamics connecting American regionalism, antebellum
politics, and southern intellectual life.
Adam Tate looks at ways in which the regionalism of Augustus Baldwin Longstreet
and Johnson Jones Hooper "embodied not only spatial categories but also
specific cultural and social characteristics." Yet Tate also applies the
argument of historians Peter Onuf and Edward Ayers to the case of these
two well-known antebellum southwestern humorists in order to demonstrate
that they shaped their ideal of regionalism within nationalistic contexts.
While their humor incorporated "different social visions," they finally
formulated a similar southern regionalism "conceived, at least in part,
on racial terms" and predicated on a need for social order that grew out
of their participation in a "national public sphere."
Essay Sections:
Introduction:
The self-conscious sectional perspectives of antebellum writers make
the literature of the antebellum South a rich source for the study of southern regionalism.
The genre of Southwest humor has received well-deserved attention in the past thirty years for
its revealing look at life in the antebellum South. Two of the best works of Southwest humor,
Augustus Baldwin Longstreet's Georgia Scenes and Johnson Jones Hooper's Some Adventures of
Captain Simon Suggs, provide a glimpse into the interplay among American regionalism,
antebellum politics, and southern intellectual life. Their uses of regionalism reveal their
politics: Longstreet's states' rights conservatism and Hooper's southern Whiggery. Even though
their political allegiances differed, both men ended up as secessionists in the late 1850s.
Political issues certainly played roles in their decisions, but their specific views of region
and society, apparent in their literary works, led them to support the cause of southern
nationalism in the winter of 1860-1861.
Historians Peter Onuf and Edward Ayers argued recently that southern independence did not
occur because of the weakness of American nationalism, as is often assumed by scholars. Rather,
southerners learned their regionalism because of their participation in American nationalism. A
region, after all, is part of a greater whole. American nationalism and the creation of a national
public sphere made southerners aware of their regional particularities. Southerners constructed a
regional identity to define themselves against perceived "foreign" adversaries.
Both Longstreet and Hooper participated in national platforms. As a young man, Longstreet
studied at Yale where he apparently loved to "play the southerner," indulging the curiosity
of his Yankee classmates by telling stories of home in his Georgia drawl. Longstreet scholar
James Scafidel has shown that Longstreet's political awakening occurred in 1813
while he studied law in Connecticut. He became appalled at New England's opposition to the
War of 1812 and developed a lifelong prejudice against Yankees. Longstreet, then, became
aware of his regional identity as a southerner in a national context. By the time he wrote
the sketches published in 1835 as Georgia Scenes, Longstreet strongly supported
John C. Calhoun and the nullification movement in South Carolina. Hooper's regional identity
was more complicated. He was a southerner in a national context and a southwesterner in a
southern context. Hooper moved from North Carolina to the Alabama frontier in 1835. The
experience of the frontier led him to consider American identity in spatial terms. Hooper's
southern identity hardened during his participation in Whig Party politics, especially as a
newspaper editor, a task that combined both national and regional interests. Hooper and
Longstreet both gained national reputations after New York publishers ran their southern stories
in national papers. The national public sphere, therefore, reinforced their southern regional
identities.
For Longstreet and Hooper regionalism embodied not only spatial categories but also
specific cultural and social characteristics. The most important element of antebellum
southern intellectual life, as Longstreet's and Hooper's writings witness, concerned determining
the best southern social order. Southern intellectuals wrote continuously about the subject
and literature allowed them to animate their theories.
Longstreet and Hooper had different social visions, as evidenced by brief perusals
of their works.
Essay Sections:
Published: 21 June 2004
© 2004 Adam Tate and
Southern
Spaces
 |