Each of the three primary methods of securing day labor employment in Atlanta — labor pools, catch-out corners, and non-profit hiring halls — has distinct features that pose advantages and disadvantages for workers.
For-profit temporary staffing agencies (commonly called "labor pools") were an intermediate entity in the relationship between "clients" and workers. Labor pools profited from the difference between what clients paid them and what they in turn paid day laborers. Contractors or businesses that needed temporary workers, for example, paid labor pools, on average, roughly two to four times the federal or state minimum wage. For their part, labor pools paid workers minimum wage or just above. Labor pools did not offer collective bargaining agreements, and benefits and amenities were few. Located throughout Atlanta, labor pools ranged from independent buildings with traditional storefronts to warehouses with crude furnishings. Labor pools were generally in neighborhoods and business districts with a high prevalence of poverty. As a business strategy, locating in poor neighborhoods was a smart decision: labor pools had easy access to a constant flow of desperate men who had limited means of securing employment in the primary labor market.
Labor pools required men to sign up for work each day as early as five o'clock in the morning. A dispatcher, usually separated from workers by a partition with an opening or a window, controlled the assignment of work. If assigned a job for the day, workers were employees of the labor pool, not the client company, and were paid by the labor pool at the end of each day. These men were hired to do, among other tasks, cleaning, loading, and setting up and breaking down at construction sites, hotels, and restaurants. They generally worked for client companies and subcontractors; seldom did they work for private homeowners. Men used this type of day labor employment for several reasons: they avoided the pushing and shoving associated with street corner pickup sites; they were covered by workers' compensation insurance if they were injured at a job site; their pay could increase if they used power tools or performed skilled work; their employment was "on the books" and fully legal in terms of tax and social security deductions; and barring unusual circumstances, they did not get "stiffed" for their daily labor.
Day laborer Danny Solomon recalls what it was like getting work at Atlanta's
labor pools:
There might be a large project going up and a construction company
they may call
a labor pool and say, 'I need thirty men.' And they'll come up with a price
and, you know, the labor pool will say, okay, you need thirty men, and we'll
charge you fourteen dollars an hour for each man, okay. And that's normally what
it is — twelve, thirteen, fourteen dollars an hour per man, but the man
himself
only gets whatever the minimum wage is.
If you didn't have a full-time job, that was your only means of supporting yourself
or getting any kind of money. You know, I worked on jobs all day long on construction
sites, and digging ditches, and stuff like that, and just being dirty and smelly,
and garbage and stuff like that, and work eight hours and come back and get paid
twenty-five to thirty dollars. But the labor pool might have made one hundred
and some dollars off me that day.
Day laborers is just exactly what it is, day labor, labor, meaning slave work
man, hauling trash, sweeping, mopping, construction clean up, the hard work,
I mean the hard work that has to be done, lifting heavy boxes, which there's
no skill involved in that. I've been on construction clean up jobs where I've
just pushed a broom all day. All day long eight hours just pushin' a broom.
Physically exhausting, emotionally exhausting.
Most of it is construction [work]. But there's a lot of warehouse, also. Unload
a truck, load a truck, organize shelves and things like that, anything that's
manual labor, sweep, mop, clean the bathrooms, anything that's unskilled and
just requires a body. Not too much on the [manufacturing] line, and if it was,
you wasn't doin' nothin' but just movin' somethin' from point A to point B, or
catching at the end and putting it in boxes. A lot of labor pools send people
to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, when the big bundles of papers come down
and stack them in the truck, which doesn't require a rocket scientist to do that.
Anything that is manual labor that requires strength.18
|
Day laborer Danny Solomon talks about working at labor pools, (4:58 min.)
Audio interview with Terry Easton, April 19 and 22, 2005, Atlanta, Georgia.
RealMedia
| Windows
Media | QuickTime
|
Grim working conditions have generally characterized Atlanta's labor pools.
In
Hard Labor: A Report on Day Labor Pools and Temporary Employment,
Randall Williams demonstrated that take-out fees for safety equipment, lunch,
and transportation
fees often brought day laborers' wages below the federal minimum. Labor pool workers
generally earned minimum wage or just above, so additional take-out fees meant
that they rarely went home with enough money to support themselves with ample
food, clothes, and shelter. "All these charges," Williams wrote in
1988, "are
deducted from a check or cash payment that is continually shrinking . . . After
deductions, typical take-home pay for an eight-hour job—and many labor pool jobs
are less than eight hours—is [twenty to twenty-five dollars]."
19 After eight
hours of work and three to four hours of travel time across a large metropolitan
region, labor pool workers' days frequently averaged ten to fourteen hours.
For many of these men the American Dream of a steady job, employment satisfaction,
a home and a car was endlessly deferred. Labor pools provided
an opportunity to make money, but also the likelihood of working extremely hard
for abysmally low pay. Emmanuel Killen, an African American man who worked at
numerous Atlanta labor pools since the early 1980s spoke with vitriol about them:
"They
are part of the discrimination against lower income or no income or homeless
people. I feel like they are nothing but a trap."
20
|
Labor pool reform advocate Ed Loring talks about labor pool workers, (1:52 min.)
Audio interview with Terry Easton, February 19, 2006, Atlanta, Georgia.
RealMedia
| Windows
Media | QuickTime
|
|
Ed Loring talks about labor pool dispatchers, (2:17 min.)
Audio interview with Terry Easton, February 19, 2006, Atlanta, Georgia.
RealMedia
| Windows
Media | QuickTime
|
By the mid-1990s, as evidenced in
Atlanta's Hardest Working People: A Report
on Day Labor Pools in Metro Atlanta, working conditions for labor pool workers
had improved little, if at all, since the publication of
Hard Labor in 1988.
21 This report reveals not only how labor pool workers experienced blacklisting,
arbitrary hiring, and discrimination, but also how practices such as illegal
charges for transportation and safety equipment continued to bring day laborers'
paychecks below federal minimum wage standards. Nearly a decade later, in
Workplace
Safety
in Atlanta’s Construction Industry: Institutional Failure in Temporary Staffing
Arrangements, Chirag Mehta found that labor pool workers in Atlanta's construction
industry labored in substandard safety conditions and reported a high prevalence
of inadequate job training and insufficient safety equipment.
22
Workers stated that the most common hazards were laboring at unsafe heights without
proper equipment and breathing high levels of dust at jobsites. Twelve percent
of the workers in this study reported that temporary agencies never provided
safety equipment. Nearly a quarter of the workers surveyed had experienced a
serious injury within the previous year and yet most did not receive treatment
or workers' compensation for their injuries.
23
Published: 21 December 2007
© 2007 Terry Easton and
Southern
Spaces